Big Johnson: I’m Special Agent Johnson of the FBI. This is Agent Johnson. No relation.
Robinson: Dwayne Robinson, LAPD. I’m in charge here.
Big Johnson: Not any more.
—Robert Davi as Big Johnson and Paul
Gleason as Deputy Police Chief Dwayne T. Robinson in Die Hard
I have to say I was a little taken aback by Monday’s Supreme
Court ruling on the Arizona immigration law.
Despite my prior cautions against reading too much into justices’
questions and comments during oral argument, I really thought the
administration was going to lose this one, and lose it badly.
Boy, was I wrong.
By now you are undoubtedly aware that on Monday the Supreme
Court struck most of the Arizona statute as unconstitutional on the basis that
it “undermine[s] federal law” in an area where the federal government has
exclusive domain. “Undermines”? How do you figure?
The Court struck three aspects of the Arizona statute. One made it a crime for immigrants to seek
employment without work permits. This
did not create a new state registration requirement. The permits to which the law referred are federal
work permits already required under existing federal law, and the
hiring of someone without that permit is already illegal under existing federal
law.
Another made it a crime for immigrants not to carry their
immigration papers on their person.
Again, this didn’t create a new state registration requirement; no one
had to file an application in Phoenix to get an Arizona green card. This part of the Arizona law was referring to
the federal immigration paper work again already required under existing
federal law.
The third stricken part of the Arizona immigration law
allowed the police to arrest anyone suspected of committing a deportable
offense. Once again, Arizona wasn’t
creating any standards for deportation, or otherwise establishing substantive
immigration policy. All it was doing was
authorizing state and local police to enforce existing federal immigration law
as established by Congress. That is no
different than local police making an arrest for interstate heroin trafficking,
or for purchasing or selling an unregistered Class III firearm (i.e., a machine gun).
In all three aspects of the statute, all Arizona was trying
to do was provide supplemental enforcement mechanisms in support of existing
federal immigration policy as set forth in existing federal law enacted by
Congress. The Arizona statute did nothing
to impair federal authority over immigration, and was in no way inconsistent
with it. Yet a majority of the Court
held that where the federal government is supreme, even complementary State
action is forbidden.
The administration, in challenging Arizona’s law, has been
long and loud in its cry that this was its exclusive domain, and that States
needed to butt out. And as if to put a
final cymbal crash on it, the Department of Homeland Security within hours of
the Court’s ruling suspended all cooperative arrangements with the State of Arizona.
Yes, Goose, I know the
finger.
Disappointed as I am in the ruling—and as nervous as it
makes me about what I had been convincing myself was going to be a Thursday ruling
striking Obamacare, and I fear the prospect that Chief Justice Roberts might turn out to be another David Souter (surely the Bushes couldn't have repeated their mistake, could they?)—there may be a silver lining here. This ruling is more likely to motivate
flagging Tea Party types to stay in the game and get to the polls than it is to
drive happy Latinos to vote. But I think
there’s a step further that can be taken here.
Some of you are going to tell me I need to be careful what I
wish for, and you may be right. But it
seems to me that two can play this game that the federal Beast is imposing on
us. If the federal government wants the
States to butt out of its policies and programs, even with complementary
support or enforcement, fine. Here are
some suggestions:
I’d like to see Arizona Governor
Jan Brewer—God bless her—continue to stick to her guns. If her problem is the federal government
isn’t enforcing its own laws in an area in which it claims exclusive
jurisdiction, make it put its money where its mouth is. She should get together with Texas Governor
Rick Perry (no chance Governor Moonbat in California will go along, and I have
no idea what you’d hear from New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez) and sue the
United States, Barack Obama, Eric Holder, and Janet Napolitano in federal court
in Texas (we go to the 5th Circuit, not the 9th as you
would out of Arizona) seeking a writ of mandamus and an affirmative injunction ordering
them to enforce the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 as it was written
by Congress.
Get as many states as will join to
terminate (if possible) all leases for all federal agencies renting space on
State property, and ban all federal law enforcement personnel from entering any
State park or building. What’s yours is yours, and what’s mine is
mine.
End all State maintenance
activities on Interstate highways. Refer
all complaints to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, and explain that those are
federal projects and are the responsibility of the federal government, as the federal government itself has made clear. I’m
sorry, I’d like to help, but we’ve been told by the White House and the United
States Supreme Court to butt out of federal affairs.
Order all state and local law
enforcement agencies to cease any efforts to investigate or arrest people in
cases of tax evasion or any other enforcement of federal law. Telephone or other communications from the
FBI, Treasury Department, BATF, or any other federal law enforcement agency are
not to be responded to beyond do it
yourself.
Finally, end all State participation
in Medicaid and any other unfunded federal mandates such as the Clean Air Act,
Americans With Disabilities Act, etc. Refer complaints to HHS, EPA, EEOC, or
whatever the appropriate federal agency is.
The
States are not mere subordinate subdivisions of the federal government to be employed or dismissed at the snap of the Beast's finger. They need to reassert their sovereignty, and
the ongoing federal war against Arizona provides a perfect backdrop against
which to do it. The Beast picked this
fight, not the States. Time for the
States to push back and tell the Beast “You
want exclusive jurisdiction, you got it.
Take care of those things your own damn self.”
What’s the Beast
gonna do about it?
No comments:
Post a Comment